Open letter to Routledge on sexual misconduct

Cover image of the book Sexual Misconduct in Academia

I recently received an email from a colleague informing me of a very concerning case regarding censorship of feminist research by the academic publisher Routledge. I have signed an open letter to Routledge and encourage other academics to do so too.

My colleague kindly granted me permission to reproduce the contents of her email on my blog, which are as follows:

Some of you will be aware of an ongoing case involving the book Sexual Misconduct in Academia: Informing an Ethics of Care in the University (2023).

The book was published by Routledge in March 2023 and contained several chapters by different authors, analysing the topic from a range of perspectives. One chapter, written by Lieselotte Viaene, Catarina Laranjeiro, and Miye Nadya Tom, analyses misconduct within an unnamed research centre, describing the culture and social norms that enabled the harassment to occur. Although no institutions or individuals were identified in the chapter, speculation about their identity led one professor to confirm that he was the “star professor” discussed in the book; he then threatened the authors in the press with legal action. Shortly after that, the book was temporarily withdrawn from circulation while Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group looked into “complaints” and a cease-and-desist letter it had received about the chapter. On 31 August 2023 the authors of Chapter 12 were informed that Routledge would no longer be making that chapter available. It is not yet clear what will happen to the rest of the book, but its page on the Routledge website has disappeared.

Colleagues across the world are deeply concerned with Routledge’s decision to remove from circulation a peer-reviewed feminist study of workplace harassment and sexual misconduct and have written, and signed, an open letter on the issue. The letter asks Routledge to:

  • publicly state why they have removed the chapter and the book itself from their website
  • reinstate chapter 12 and the book as a whole

The open letter can be found here:

We are inviting colleagues to sign the open letter. If you’d like to do so, click here.

One thought on “Open letter to Routledge on sexual misconduct

  1. Hi Ruth

    I was just thinking, as started reading that; not another one, not another leftie one please, like most recently De Sousa Santos – only to realise it is the De Sousa Santos case

    Ach tae fuck!

    I’m not at all shocked or surprised to find staff sexual harassment of other staff and of other students (noting that universities and bodies such as Universities UK and HEPI etc make a big deal of sexual harassment, but tend to choose to focus on student on student, bodyswerving the issues with own actual staff!) is rife.

    Still find masel capable of being shocked though, at least with respect to some figures on the supposed genuinely radical, critical left(s) – either through public or too often personal knowledge.

    fuckin gggggggrrrrrrr PS he’s a lawyer by training originally – De Sousa Santos G

    Work like you don’t need money Love like you’ve never been hurt and dance like no-one’s watching

    “Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world.” Richard Shaull (foreword to Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed)

    “Education is the point at which we decide whether we love the world enough to assume responsibility for it, and by the same token save it from that ruin which except for renewal, except for the coming of the new and the young, would be inevitable.” Hannah Arendt (The Crisis of Education)

    “it is impossible to imagine a future unless we have located ourselves in the present and its history; however, the reverse is also true in that we cannot locate ourselves in the present and its history unless we imagine the future and commit to creating it” (Anna Stetsenko, 2015).

    “Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out well, but the certainty that something is worth doing no matter how it turns out” Vaclev Havel

Leave a comment