“Advancing transgender equality: a plan for action” was today published on the Home Office website. The document is the latest step in a historic programme of trans engagement undertaken by the current government. So, how does it shape up?
Regular readers of this blog will be quite aware of how much I distrust and dislike the Conservative-led government. Their work on trans equality (in a purely liberal sense) has, however, been quite impressive on the whole.
Under the leadership of Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone – who has long been a trans ally in Parliament – the Home Office has pursued a programme of engagement and genuine consultation that quite outstrips anything achieved by the previous Labour government (who generally passed trans equality legislation only when ordered to by the European courts).
The action plan promises a robust response to needs expressed by the trans community on a whole variety of fronts. Most of the government’s promises involve the production guidance for various individuals, organisations and/or sectors: this may not sound like much, but the value of this documentation should not be underestimated. Some of the biggest challenges we face arise simply from the fact that doctors, civil servants and others simply don’t know what they’re doing when confronted with trans issues, so it’s good to see this addressed. Of course, we’ll have to see how these promises actually pan out.
So, what do we have?
- The big news is arguably the
introduction of trans hate crime legislation. The government plans to amend existing laws in order to provide for:
“[…] sentences to be aggravated for any offencemotivated by hostility towards the victim onthe grounds of being transgender, and for a30 year starting point for murders motivated by hostility towards the victim on the groundsof being transgender.”
- The government has also promised to “review” how gender identity is represented in passport application forms, and in passports. It’s not inconceivable that this may lead to the introduction of gender-neutral passports, particularly as the IPS admitted in September that they are “considering” this option. The explicit recognition of “non-gendered” individuals in the action plan itself is also an interesting move on this front.
Various government departments are assigned responsibility for a whole host of actions, including:
- the issuing of statuatory guidance to increase head teachers’ power to tackle bullying (inc. transphobic bullying)
- further emphasis upon “prejudice-based bullying” (inc. transphobic bullying) in Ofsted inspections*
- working to build trans equality into existing practices within primary, secondary and further education (e.g. in PSHE lessons, teacher skills programmes, FE equalities training)
- updating “advice for employers on recruiting and employing transgender employees”
- revising guidance for Job Centre staff
- additional “pre-employment support” for marginalised groups (inc. trans people)
- clear guidance on trans pension rights on the DWP website, and better handling of pension claims
- guidance on holding public sector bodies to account through the Equality Duty (an aspect of the Equality Act 2010)
- “clear and concise” guidance on transition treatment pathways for GPs and PCTs
- information on trans health (including sexual health) on the NHS Choices website
- ensuring that health consultations are trans-inclusive
- updating privacy guidance within government departments (inc. provide better guidance on the use of privacy markers to protect privacy for employers and benefit claimants)
- a guide to equality legislation and policy for trans people
- community outreach on the democratic system and relevant government programmes
- working with housing providers to produce best practice guidance on trans accomodation (inc. advice on tackling transphobic anti-social behaviour)
- “Work[ing] with the transgender community” during the marriage equality consultation
- continuing to play an active role in condemning transphobic violence and discrimination through the Council of Europe and the United Nations
- providing better guidance on gender identity and trans individuals within the asylum system
Moreover, there a number of actions the government has already taken:
- police forces have been required to collect data on transphobic hate incidences since April 2011
- trans people are included (just about) in the Charter against homophobia and transphobia in sport
- a module on gender identity has been launched as part ofthe training course for asylum decision-makers
- transphobic bullying was included in an anti-bullying guidance for headteachers
- UK diplomats worked to promote a historic United Nations Human Rights Council resolution condemning homophobic and transphobic violence and discrimination
My general impression of the document – and planned actions within – is broadly positive. However, there were a few items of concern within the action plan:
As part of the Government’s wider work to
develop a new NHS Commissioning System,
ensure greater consistency in commissioning
gender identity services, increased patient choice
and more cost effective treatment plans for
The term “more cost effective treatment plans” certainly rings alarm bells. How many ways can transition become less expensive to the NHS whilst retaining an appropriate level of care? Moreover, “increased patient choice” definitely sounds like it’s part of the government’s dodgy privatization agenda. On the other hand, this point may simply entail a removal of bureaucratic barriers, and the “greater consistency” should, hopefully, be a positive development overall. Time will tell.
Deliver a framework for evaluating the Equality
Act, including the implementation of the
exceptions on gender reassignment.
Will this work to prevent companies from exploiting loopholes in order to discriminate against trans people, or will it help organisations such as Rape Crisis deny access to vital services?
Run a workshop for the transgender community
to increase their understanding of the public
sector Equality Duty and how they can hold
public bodies to account
A single workshop for the “transgender community”? I hope we’re all invited!
Finally, there’s a lot of talk about “considering” and things that might be “possible”. I do wonder how many of these points will be translated into firm action.
Fortunately, there’s not too much of this, but there’s the odd action point that stinks. There have clearly been Tory spin-doctors at work on this document, because at times it’s clearly attempting to push the government’s agenda in a number of areas rather than, y’know, trans equality. Whether or not you agree with this agenda is up to you (personally, I’m against for all sorts of reasons) but surely this kind of action plan shouldn’t really be about pushing the government’s pet projects?
Some choice quotes (emphasis mine):
“Transgender people, from transsexual to nongendered,
want to be able to participate in and make their contribution to society and the economy.“
Wait, I thought this was about equality and fairness, rather than corporate drone culture?
Equality of opportunity in employment is
fundamental to building a strong economy and
a fair society. We know that workplaces that are
more inclusive are also more productive.
Glad to see the government has its priorities sorted.
Take active measures to ensure that the views of
transgender users shape the Government’s Care
and Support White Paper and create a care
market that is more responsive to diverse needs.
Because “care” should be bought and sold, and markets are necessarily efficient.
Promote, via government information portals,
relevant funding streams to the transgender
community to ensure they are aware of funding
available to participate in the localism agenda.
That totally makes up for all the national funding that’s been cut, right?
Ensure that National Citizen Service (NCS) for
16 year olds is an inclusive and safe environment
for all participants, including transgender people,
by encouraging NCS providers to build equality
issues into their information and training for staff.
Another pet project! To be fair, at least they’re putting some effort into ensuring its actually accessible and all.
An absolute howler courtesy of the “headline findings” from the community surveys that fed into the action plan:
Nearly two-thirds of respondents (47%) thought that intervention, such as guidance or training, would be best focussed in secondary school
And if that’s not confirmation that the government needs to invest properly in education, I don’t know what is.